Re: IP renumbering timeframe

[Marshall Eubanks]

Since I run a small AS :

I like this idea.

Since I believe in living dangerously :

I also think that a /64 should be reserved in the IPv6 address space, 
and (32 bit) ASN's should be given their own /32 in a GLOP like fashion 
for IPv6.

Leo Bicknell wrote:

> In a message written on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:27:49AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> > I'd be mildly concerned that people would see "free IP blocks" and start
> > using them even when not necessary. I think allocating them a /24 from
> > this block only when they have demonstrated need, and don't have any other
> > ARIN assigned blocks, would be far more efficient.
> Since the goal is to reduce paperwork, I'm not sure about 'demonstrated
> need', but I could definately endorse "you get a /24 with your ASN if
> and only if you have no other registry assigned space assigned to you".
> I specifically exclude provider allocated space, as I'm assuming the ASN
> goal is to multihome.
--
                                 Regards
                                 Marshall Eubanks



T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624       Fax     : 703-293-9609
e-mail : tme@multicasttech.com
http://www.multicasttech.com

Test your network for multicast :
http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
 Status of Multicast on the Web  :
 http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html