North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: IP renumbering timeframe
- From: Leo Bicknell
- Date: Thu May 30 11:01:02 2002
In a message written on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> It would add 30% to the number of BGP address blocks pretty much automatically.
How do you come up with that number? Of course, we have an issue
with reclaiming existing space, but I think there are a number of
people who have /20's today who only need a /24. Also, only
allocated ASN's could anounce (what's that, 24k today?), and probably
half or more of those would choose not to use this /24. Why would
say, UUnet with /12's need a /24? So I'm thinking worst case this
might be 5-15k new routes, which is probably 3-13% of the total
space already announced.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
|
