North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios)
- From: E.B. Dreger
- Date: Fri May 10 10:40:41 2002
JS> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:26:13 -0400
JS> From: James Smith
JS> > Hmmmm.... maybe there should be a "list of peering
JS> > policies" site a la Jared's NOC page.
JS> Interesting idea. Include verifiable user comments as to what
JS> the policy actually is as exemplified by actual practice
JS> vs. what they say it is (or should be)...
...which would be interesting, except NDAs and grandfathered-
in ASNs that don't meet the requirements, yet haven't been
depeered, might make things interesting...
 IANAL, but how can something public be considered a trade
secret protected by NDA? Perhaps the exact peering
arrangements are not public, but routing information is at
least semi-public. (Any downstream can identify peers. Or
if a net participates in a route server a la oregon-ix, then
they're pretty much disclosing interconnect lists.)
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <email@example.com>
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <firstname.lastname@example.org>, or you are likely to