North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)
- From: Aditya
- Date: Sun Mar 10 12:06:35 2002
I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for
the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote:
> Thanks Bill!
> Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on
> From the note sent out to participants on Monday:
> PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x
> PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x
> If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in
> number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with
> the folks at the NAP.
> At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering
> >the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA. So you should not see
> >either 184.108.40.206 or 220.127.116.11 in your traceroutes or from
> >your peers as of 28 feb 2002.