North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP
- From: Paul Timmins
- Date: Thu Feb 28 19:30:49 2002
I have no connection to this software other than being a satisfied user.
At 07:29 PM 2/28/2002, Nicole Harrington wrote:
Does anyone know of a program that can flag such things and alter mail
on the fly like this?
On 28-Feb-02 Unnamed Administration sources reported Jared Mauch said :
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:35:09PM -0700, Daniel Lark wrote:
>> You are most correct, it is definitely a double edged sword. Let's say
>> you try to reverse DNS on an address who's nameserver is down or
>> otherwise unreachable, what then? Some admins I know deliberately do run
>> reverse DNS as they view it as system cracker tool, or they feel it is
>> an unwarranted load, RFCs be damned. Is this admin decision the fault of
>> the user?
> Use a non clueless isp. the market is fairly saturated in
> most places with service providers.
>> You are not first one to try this. I have tried this myself and a
>> financial type didn't get an important email because of it. You know the
>> rest of the story.
> What I do is format my smtp headers such that a very simple
> regex can find mail with no reverse dns and dump it in a spam folder.
> I find this catches a lot of the messages.
> I try and let people know but for example, I am unable to
> find anyone at American Express or NWA that can fix their dns.
> (others are prompt in fixing their dns problems).
>> A better solution is to check the ip and see if it is an MX record for
>> the domain the mail purports to be from.
> This has a number of flaws. I won't delve into them though.
>> Just my opinion, and I could wrong.
> - Jared
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
>> Patrick Muldoon
>> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:15 PM
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: Reverse DNS and SMTP
>> We have recently implemented a policy on our mail servers of not
>> accepting mail from hosts that do not correctly resolve via reverse DNS.
>> While we on the technical side love the idea, there have been some
>> questions from the business side of the house.
>> If an ISP who doesn't have reverse DNS setup correctly on their
>> mail servers, we point them to the RFC's and generally offer to help
>> them correct it.
>> We have noticed that our spam has reduced drastically, and the
>> complaints are few, but alas this is a double edged sword, where if you
>> even block 1 legitimate e-mail out of the 100K+ that we receive daily,
>> someone is going to complain.
>> Just curious if anybody here is doing the same and the response that
>> they have had from doing so. Replies off list are fine and I will
>> summarize if people are interested.
>> Patrick Muldoon, Network/Software Engineer
>> INOC, LLC
>> Press Ctrl-Alt-Del now for IQ test.
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from email@example.com
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
|\ __ /| (`\
| o_o |__ ) )
Daemon Technologies(tm) | Phone: 510.895.9667
- Powered by FreeBSD -
Email, DNS, SiteHosting, FTP Services,
Dedicated Servers, Co-Location, and a Lot More
" Daemons" will now be known as "spiritual guides"
-Politically Correct UNIX Page