North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Date: Sun Feb 03 12:37:18 2002
- Distribution: cistron
- Newsgroups: lists.nanog
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Paul Vixie <email@example.com> wrote:
>Pull it, rather than pushing it. nntpcache is a localized example of how
>to only transfer the groups and articles that somebody on your end of a
>link actually wants to read. A more systemic example ought to be developed
>whereby every group has a well-mirrored home and an nntpcache hierarchy
>similar to what Squid proposed for web data, and every news reader pulls
>only what it needs. Posting an article should mean getting it into the
>well-mirrored home of that group. Removing spam should mean deleting
>articles from the well-mirrored home of that group.
Yes, but who's going to set up the home for movies/pictures/warez/mp3
groups? Nobody, ofcourse, since most stuff is not very legal.
But those groups are 98% of todays traffic.
So if you *do* manage to switch everybody over to that new system
and turn off the old usenet, the new system isn't needed anymore.
Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso