North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
- From: Greg Pendergrass
- Date: Thu Jan 31 14:22:24 2002
Absolutely. If one goes to an all-you-can-eat buffet and has 4 plates of
food, can the restaurant complain to them? Of course not, unless they have a
definition of unlimited I don't know of. If you advertise unlimited access
to a customer then they can use it as much as they want to, by definition.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
Steven J. Sobol
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Greg Pendergrass
Cc: Rowland, Alan D; email@example.com
Subject: RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:
> It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100%
> what they pay for.
So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
$20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?
JustThe.net LLC - Steve "Web Dude" Sobol, CTO ICQ: 56972932/WebDude216
website: http://JustThe.net email: sjsobol@JustThe.net phone: 216.619.2NET
postal: 5686 Davis Drive, Mentor On The Lake, OH 44060-2752 DalNet: ZX-2