Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

  • From: Jon Mansey
  • Date: Thu Jan 31 12:22:26 2002


2 comments

1) when your primary machine is an XP/2K box running ICS, is that illegal also? Are we to expect comcast to come knocking at the door wanting to inspect the configuration of our PCs to see if it has 2 NICs, or a wireless card in it? Are we supposed to willingly just open up our PCs so comcast can look inside?

2) I heard recently of ppl openly sharing their broadband connection using 802.11 access points, Airports etc among friends, neighbors, coworkers. I can see where your DSL or cable company would be a little more concerned about losing revenue like this, over just 2 or 3 PCs sharing at one domestic location.

jm

On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 07:57 AM, Martin J. Levy wrote:



I got this forwarded to me. I'm not impressed.

Based upon the general desire for providers to have NAT'ed users and to reduce IP-space usage where appropriate, does this make sense? I can understand the providers desire to increase revenue, but I don't believe this is a good way to do it.

Besides the technical difficulties of detecting a household that is running a NAT'ed router, why not win over the customer with a low-cost extra IP address vs: the customers one-time hardware cost for the router.
There are people who would be willing to pay some amount monthly vs: (let's say) $100 for a NAT box.

Does anyone know what percentage of home broadband users run NAT? Does anyone have stats for IP-addresses saved by using NAT?

Martin

------ Forwarded Message
From: Ward Clark <ward@joyofmacs.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:00:32 -0500
To: "NetTalk" <nettalk@sustworks.com>
Subject: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

Today's MacInTouch links to a report that appeared in SlashDot on
Thursday:

"A co-worker of mine resigned today. His new job at Comcast: Hunting down
'abusers' of the service. More specifically, anyone using NAT to connect
more than one computer to their cable modem to get Internet access-
whether or not you're running servers or violating any other Acceptable
Use Policies. Comcast has an entire department dedicated to eradicating
NAT users from their network. ... did anyone think they'd already be
harassing people that are using nothing more than the bandwidth for which
they are paying? ..." Earthlink and Comcast have both been advertising
lately their single-household, multi-computer services (and additional
fees) -- probably amusing to many thousands of broadband-router owners,
at least until the cable companies really crack down.

There's a huge number of responses (691 at the moment), which I quickly
scanned out of curiosity. I'm not a Comcast or Earthlink user.

You can start here:

http://slashdot.org/articles/02/01/24/1957236.shtml

-- ward


--------------------
To unsubscribe <mailto:requests@sustworks.com> with message body
"unsubscribe nettalk"

------ End of Forwarded Message





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.