North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Tim Devries
- Date: Tue Jan 15 15:45:33 2002
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Donelan" <email@example.com>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "David G. Andersen" <email@example.com>; "Ian A Finlay"
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: huh
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > > Um, it's firewalled? Most of microsoft isn't traceroutable or
> > >pingable.
> > Yup:
> > b129$ ipsrvtrace -p 80 windowsupdate.microsoft.com
> > 15 22.214.171.124 126.96.36.199 155.934 156.415 156.973
> > 16 iusbsecurc1202-ge-6-0.msft.net 188.8.131.52 13.109 13.598
> > 17 - - * * *
> > 18 184.108.40.206 220.127.116.11 13.988 14.373 *
> Microsoft has been moving/changing Windowsupdate.microsoft.com for
> the last week or so. The problems have been covered extensively
> in other forums.
> Although microsoft technicians have messed up access filters on its
> routers in the past, I believe this is just them blocking some packets
> used by the standard traceroute. If you are having other problems
> with windowsupdate, I think they are unrelated to traceroute.
Ok, well this is good to know. Although it still doesn't explain why my
firewall is reporting DNS UDP/TCP probes from windowupdate.com on a regular