North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
- From: Joe Abley
- Date: Thu Nov 01 10:31:58 2001
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 12:13:08PM +0000, Nigel Titley wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > 214/8 and 215/8 seem to have been allocated to the U.S. DoD in ca. 1998.
> > > There does seem to be a few sizeable announcements (which overlap a few
> > > not-so-sizable ones), but I have to wonder if anyone can explain the
> > > grounds on which they were allocated these two /8s, and which body
> > > did the allocation. Anyone?
> > >
> > > Sean.
> > I could. Why does it matter?
> Oh, openness, transparency, that sort of thing. Nothing really
The full RFC2050 justification for a /7's worth of space would
be a mighty and wondrous thing to behold.