North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks
- Date: Mon Sep 10 16:31:14 2001
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said:
> Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at
> hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer
> to most of the questions.
Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG?
A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use.
Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance,
should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers?
A2: See Q1.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
Attachment:
pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
