North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
- From: Wojtek Zlobicki
- Date: Tue Jul 31 18:05:40 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roeland Meyer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "'Charles Sprickman'" <email@example.com>; "Jared Mauch"
Cc: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: RE: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
> > From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:41 AM
> > 6) Finding a unix ssh that supports 3DES and DES.
> > I curse those OpenSSH folks for making me have to trudge
> > through the code
> > to find out how to get DES working...
> > 6a) Finding a release on CCO that supports 3DES.
> You are probably aware, but EFF published the DES crack. I understand that
> it is now an issue of cracking DES in less than 12 hours. 3DES is better
> but it only amounts to DES with a 128-bit key.
> Definitely a limited shelf-live.
I don't see why we even need to discuss some of these issues to this length.
Telnet = Bad = Plain Text
SSH = Better = Some Sort of Encryption (A Decoder Ring is Still better than