North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: whatever happened to RED? (was: Improving Robustness...)
- From: Simon Leinen
- Date: Fri Jul 13 10:15:54 2001
>>>>> "was" == William Allen Simpson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Didn't we have a solution to this problem? And the UDP flood from
> Real? And a host of other problems with saturated links?
> My operational issue is: what is the status of RED? Being small and
> only having cisco and *nix routers, I'd expect it was widely
RED alone doesn't help much against flooding attacks. You'd need
something like "RED with penalty box" or (flow-based) WFQ, and those
are either in research status or have other fundamental problems.
Don't get me wrong, RED is extremely cool - buy only routers that
support this at line rate, and configure it on any interface where you
expect even a slight chance of congestion.