Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Cogent Communications Info

  • From: Marshall Eubanks
  • Date: Thu Jul 05 22:51:37 2001

>
IMHO multicast is a killer app, maybe THE killer app, for BLECs, as it conserves
sparse bandwidth, fits well with the ethernet LANs typically used with BLECs
for the "last mile," and as multicast peering is fairly straightfoward in the
BLEC scenario.
BLEC multicast also offers interesting opportunities for advertisers, as ads
can target specific clusters of buidlings. 
We have convinced at least one BLEC of these advantages; others on NANOG should
feel free to contact me off list for assistance
in setting up multicast.

                                   Regards
                                   Marshall Eubanks

 
   Multicast Technologies, Inc.
   10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
   Fairfax, Virginia 22030
   Phone : 703-293-9624          Fax     : 703-293-9609     
   e-mail : tme@on-the-i.com     http://www.on-the-i.com         

 Test your network for multicast : 
http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
Check the status of multicast in real time : 
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html


>The wierd thing here is that Williams doesn't have an overabundance of
>peering either. They had been SBC's primary IP transit provider for their
>DSL product, but rumor has it that SBC has selected other providers to
>replace them. Perhaps Williams has massive transit contracts of their own,

>and they are trying to cut their losses? Reselling transit for $50/meg is
>better than not reselling it at all.
>
>I doubt Cogent's long term plans are dependent on Williams' firesale transit

>pricing.
>
>- Daniel Golding
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
>> Vincent J. Bono
>> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 10:03 PM
>> To: David U.
>> Cc: Nanog List
>> Subject: Re: Cogent Communications Info
>>
>>
>>
>> Just to test them out we ordered their "private line" service (rather than

>> the transit product) where it is $10/meg point to point, i.e.
>> 100Mbps cross
>> country is $1,000 per end per month.  Its a tunneled IP product
>> with an ATM
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> They are already 90 days overdue and show no signs of delivery
>> anytime soon.
>>
>> They are heavily involved with Williams for the ATM backbone and
>> I know that
>> Williams is selling IP transit to big telecom accounts for as little as
>> $50/meg.  Since they don't seem to have a lot of peering possibly they are

>> filling in the gaps with Williams transit and coming up with a skewed cost

>> model?
>>
>> -Vincent
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David U." <davidu@everydns.net>
>> To: "Nanog List" <nanog@merit.edu>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:40 PM
>> Subject: Cogent Communications Info
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I have been reading about Cogent Communications recently and
>> was wondering
>> how
>> > they can possibly offer 100mbps for $3000 ($1000 if you are an end-user,

>> not a
>> > service provider).  It just seems too good to be true and we
>> know how that
>> > goes...
>> >
>> > Does anyone on NANOG have experience with them?
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > For those who don't know:  Cogent offers 100 mbps at $3000 to service
>> provider
>> > or 1000gbps for $20,000.  http://www.cogentco.com has some info but not

>> much.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > -davidu
>> >
>>
>

Marshall Eubanks

tme@21rst-century.com




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.