North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Cable Modem [really good network design]
- From: Wojtek Zlobicki
- Date: Tue Jun 26 18:30:56 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Kuhtz" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Wojtek Zlobicki" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Cable Modem [really good network design]
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:01:41PM -0400, Wojtek Zlobicki wrote:
> > ATM to the desktop never took off, whats wrong with Ethernet over ATM ?
> > With devices such as
> > IADS, it allows for easy differentiation of traffic. Now you can cary
> > and data over the same
> > physical link without worry.
> Ever tried it without that? I have done quite a bit of less than
> testing of VoIP over a QoS-less infrastructures. Small VoIP packets seem
> have little trouble squeezing thru and it works actually pretty well.
> without ATM QoS crap on a broadband connection.
I have to concede here. We were able to run the VOIP traffic using UBR, out
not being saturated, this may have helped, on a busy network, a lot of
problems could have
arrisen. What is nice, is that QOS is easy to enable in ATM. There are
many reasons that
ATM has not taken off, from a CLEC perspective, I believe it to be the
I would much rather have a 10 Mbps Ethernet feed from a company like Cogent
links do not compare in pricing with DSL.
> Christian Kuhtz <firstname.lastname@example.org> -wk, <email@example.com> -hm
> Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA,
> "I speak for myself only.""