North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Self Regulation (was Re: New peering criteria)
- From: Sean M. Doran
- Date: Wed Jun 06 17:57:03 2001
| I would imagine that such actions tend to irritate the hive of regulatory
| officials. Self regulation would be one way to prevent such action.
The answer is simple: have more lawyers than most jurisdictions
have civil servants.
q: what is a phone company?
a: it's a law firm with a side-interest in telecommunications
q: what do phone company facilities look like?
a: boxes with no windows stuffed with lawyers and an antenna on top
q: who has more employees? a standalone ISP or a phone company's legal
branch's Human Resources department?
a: that's not funny. see you in court.
q: is it true that some phone companies' legal branches are revenue centres?
a: oh yes. and don't forget that at least one IXC _literally_
sued itself into existence.
Is there any serious and relevant regulatory authority which
is going to intervene in a contractual dispute between parties
which are NOT dominant in their industry?
It seems to me that players like C&W face vigorous competition.
PS - can you tell how much i hate it when vaguely technical people
pose ex cathedra about vaguely legal & regulatory issues?
Sean Doran <email@example.com>
>From WordNet (r) 1.6 [wn]:
"mulch, noun. 1. a protective covering of half-rotten vegetable matter (cf legal department)"