Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: 95th Percentile = Lame

  • From: Joe Blanchard
  • Date: Mon Jun 04 00:52:24 2001

Title: RE: 95th Percentile = Lame

Hmm, I thought 1's were high and 0's were low? lol

Oh well, such is digital..


-Joe Blanchard

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:26 PM
To: Joe Blanchard
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: 95th Percentile = Lame


> In reading this thread. Does this mean that if I send an 0xFFFF bit pattern
> to a network versus a 0x0000 pattern I'd be charged more for the energy
> consumption since all the 1's are high and consume more elecetric

no, it's the transitions from 0 to 1 or vice versa that take the energy.
that's why the nanog list is so repetitive, saves money.

randy




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.