North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
- From: Joe Blanchard
- Date: Mon Jun 04 00:20:34 2001
Title: RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
In reading this thread. Does this mean that if I send an 0xFFFF bit pattern to a network versus a 0x0000 pattern I'd be charged more for the energy consumption since all the 1's are high and consume more elecetric, and is there a larger charge for CA given the electric issues there?
Well just had to throw that in since some of these comments are a bit far fetched....
just my 2Ęs
Happy Monday all.