North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Statements against new.net?
- From: Shawn McMahon
- Date: Fri Mar 16 10:27:09 2001
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:57:24AM -0800, email@example.com wrote:
> I don't know what your job entails, but my job description includes the
> phrase "keeping the network and all associated servers and services
> functional." Which means, among other things, making sure DNS
> works. Were I to go with new.net, I would be remiss in my duties
> and should (though I probably wouldn't) be fired.
I buy that as a reason for you not to use them, and I buy that as a reason
for me not to use them.
I don't buy it as a reason to make what they're doing illegal, which is
what a few in this discussion are advocating.
That'd be like making IPX illegal, because it prevents those machines
from properly interoperating with TCP/IP.
Description: PGP signature