*ponders*
Is it possible that our technical solutions are at least
contributorially responsible for the economic slowdown? (Small
businesses can't get connected, so large numbers of high-money dotcoms get
massive amounts of funding, but few of them can make any money, so their debts
skyrocket, and the massive power shifts happen?)
Don't mind me, I'm just pondering.
-Mat
-----Original Message-----
From:
Roeland Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:53 PM
To:
'Patrick Greenwell'; Steven M. Bellovin
Cc:
nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Broken Internet?
> From: Patrick Greenwell [mailto:patrick@cybernothing.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:29 AM
> to change the fact that these alternative root server
> networks exist and
>
that the Internet still works, mostly(as I'm sure you'd agree
> it's always a little broken.)
That is an understatement (a little broken). I have just been
introduced to
one of those broken areas, the hard
way.
Given:
1. Prefix filtering at
/20.
2. Most small busineses limited to /24, by
policy/procedure.
3. Multi-homing requirements for
multi-office businesses (many SOHO's).
4. Impending
business failure of many DSL ISPs.
5. Total lack of
responsibile behavior among DSL access providers.
It is next to impossible for a small business to have reliable
internet
connectivity without moving into a large
co-lo. Even if they can afford the
multiple T1's, they
can't get portable IP addresses that will be advertised
reliably. Many of them need, at most, a pair of /24's and ARIN,
knowing
this, will not issue them portable blocks
larger than /24 without severe
justification
requirements.
Many of you might think that is okay, but what if their
upstream dies off
(as recently happened to MHSC). In
the current day and age, business stops
until they get
reconnected. This disconnect is at minimum, 4-6 weeks, under
the best of circumstances. As one vendor recently pointed out in
their
adverts, most businesses, down for more than 14
days, will never survive.
More importantly, such an
outage flat-lines the revenue picture for that
entire
fiscal quarter, for the unlucky victim.
What we have today is a manufactured dependence on a single
upstream
provider and no way to multi-home. Even co-lo
boils down to single-home
dependency.
Yes, there are a bunch of hacks to work around this problem.
But, that is
exactly what they are ... hacks. They are
not something I could build a
sustainable business
around.
Any business needs:
1. to be able to
change upstream providers without having to renumber.
2. to be able to change access providers without having to
suffer
multi-month down-times.
3. to be able to have its net-block(s) visible regardless of which ISPs
they
are currently using.
Currently the only ones that can do that are those
that;
1. Are large enough to justify a /20 (begging
the question of how they got
that large).
2. Can afford their own datacenter.
It looks like our technical solutions are raising unreasonable
barriers to
entry for small businesses.
