North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Ken Eddings
- Date: Thu Mar 08 21:34:48 2001
No don't do that. I get too much mail from well-meaning folks that
think our registry records have been hacked.
No. I usually depend on Network Solutions to hack our records, ;-)
At 4:59 PM -0800 3/8/01, Mathew Butler wrote:
You -could- always do the whois-type thing, where ALL records
containing 'apple' are returned, on first access to the name?
From: Simon Lockhart [<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: new.net
>Therefore any company which creates a broader hierarchy is not motivated
by what's best for Internet users, who are best served by a simple
Okay. You picked an example which proves your point. However, there's
hierarchy (IBM is IBM is IBM no matter what you append to it).
plenty of exceptions. Who should have "apple" in this flat namespace?
Apple Computers? Apple Records? Apple Fruitstore?
While the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) is a fairly well-known
name worldwide, what gives us more claim to "bbc" in the flat namespace
than "Big Blue and Cousins" or "Baptist Bible College" (bbc.org and
bbc.edu respectively)? Have we now got bbc.com because we had a greater
claim to it, or because we had the better lawyers?
Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676
Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516
BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart@bbc.co.uk
Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL:
Ken Eddings, Hostmaster, IS&T, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Work:+1 408 974-4286 Pager: +1 408 699-3591, Fax: +1 408 974-1560
Apple Computer, Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, M/S 60-DR Cupertino, CA 95014
The Prudent Mariner never relies solely on any single aid to navigation.