North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
- From: Ben Browning
- Date: Wed Mar 07 22:05:29 2001
At 06:00 PM 3/7/2001, Vadim Antonov wrote:
For some reason, I can't see CNN broadcasting "Come visit our website, at
220.127.116.11 or 18.104.22.168 or 22.214.171.124 or 126.96.36.199 or 188.8.131.52
or 184.108.40.206 or 220.127.116.11 or 18.104.22.168 or 22.214.171.124 or
126.96.36.199 or or 188.8.131.52 or 184.108.40.206". Not to mention the fact
that IPv6 will make that even uglier.
The only real solutiuon to the present and future DNS woes is to replace
it with the hyperlinks, portals, address books and search engines - and
_no_ human-readable names. This effectively creates as many "roots" as
there are users. My "John Doe" is not the same as your "John Doe" :)
I *like* DNS. Abolishing it would be akin to, say, removing the UNIX path
environment variable and all aliasing/symlinking support from the kernel.
~Ben (I speak for myself, here)
Ben Browning <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The River Internet Access Co.