North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: 126.96.36.199/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Question - how do work around...]
- From: Paul Schultz
- Date: Tue Feb 27 18:41:05 2001
I think we're talking about filtering the 188.8.131.52/8 prefix, EXACT prefix.
That wouldn't block anyone from reaching anything as long as you only filter
the /8 and not any of the more specific advertisements.
My company's got a /16, a /17, and a /18 out of 64/8 and I *WANT* people to
filter out the annoying 184.108.40.206/8 prefix that much of my traffic may be
destined for if something explodes on my end and my routes get withdrawn.
From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: 220.127.116.11/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Question - how do work
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:01:46AM -0800, Christian Nielsen wrote:
> > For 18.104.22.168/8 this seems to have happened in the meantime... but now
> > there's a route for 22.214.171.124/8 (the RIPE equivalent of 126.96.36.199/8),
> i dont know why you even allow 64/8 and/or 62/8 into your network. Filter
Aren't many Earthlink dialups in 64/8?
Filtering that would mean his employees couldn't get Sprint DSL, and
prevent millions of potential customers from reaching his web servers.
That's not smart business. It's called "cutting off your nose to spite