North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: rfc 1918?
- From: SMcGrath
- Date: Fri Feb 23 15:42:26 2001
Bill, You get the 10 point bonus.
Are we leaking RFC1918 SMTP headers ?
Scott
bill manning <bmanning@localhost.localdomain>@merit.edu on 02/23/2001
02:49:32 PM
Please respond to bmanning@karoshi.com
Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
To: nanog@merit.edu
cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: rfc 1918?
SMcGrath@dhhs.state.nh.us wrote:
>
> Agreed Valdis,
>
> Our upstream's use 1918 addresses internally so that 1918 addresses are
> constantly bouncing off our filters
> we have an aggressive egress filter which makes sure no 1918's leak and
> pollute the internet ;-} and filtering on core routers is a suboptimal
> solution RFC 1819 addresses (10 points to the person who knows the
> predecessor) NEED to be filtered at the border IMHO.
>
> Scott
>
AS long as you are filtering, could you -PLEASE- add the SMTP filter to
prevent email w/ RFC 1918 addresses in the headers from leaking out of
your networks?
RFC 1597.
--bill
|
