North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Network for Sale
- From: Paul A Vixie
- Date: Wed Feb 21 16:53:36 2001
> > RTT doesn't drive performance, (bw*delay)-loss does.
>
> FWIW, the heavily interactive apps are more affected by RTT than they are
> by bandwidth. Network games are the new TELNET. They despise varying
> latency levels, and are generally oblivious to bandwidth. Your point is
> still mostly valid, in that the only thing they hate more than varying
> latency is packet loss, but if the network isn't losing packets then RTT
> does affect "perfomance" for the heavily interactive apps.
i wasn't talking about network performance in general. (and i would never,
ever recommend (bw*delay)-loss as a routing metric!) this is in the context
of so-called global server load balancing. RTT may, or may not, matter in
the decisions such a system must make ("serve this client from which proxy?")
|
