North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Fwd: RE: Global routing table bloat
- From: Hank Nussbacher
- Date: Sun Feb 18 13:10:10 2001
Another responsible net-citizen.
From: "Bluett, Mike" <email@example.com>
To: "'Hank Nussbacher'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com.CA, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Subject: RE: Global routing table bloat
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:24:18 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Yes, we are aware of this and started last week to implement some further
aggregation. Our upstream providers have to get their prefix filters
updated before we can go ahead with the routing change. That process is
Either tomorrow or early next week we should be cutting our routes by
approx. 100 prefixes.
Have a great day!!!
From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:05 PM
To: firstname.lastname@example.org.CA; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
Subject: Global routing table bloat
AS271 has been lately seen to be sending out too many prefixes not based on
CIDR boundries, thereby increasing the global router table size:
ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description
AS271 280 132 148 52.9% University of British Columbia
See http://www.mcvax.org/~jhma/routing/ and
for further details.
I hope you can take the time to add the appropriate BGP filters so that the
we all do not suffer from global router table bloat.