North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
- From: Sean Donelan
- Date: Thu Feb 01 23:09:03 2001
On Thu, 01 February 2001, Paul Vixie wrote:
> email@example.com (Pim van Riezen) writes:
> > bogosity while updating 8.2.2-P7 to 8.2.3:
> > (1) 8.2.3 Doesn't accept the "(" in the SOA string to be on the next line
> > after the IN SOA. Our script-generated zonefiles, about 45000 of them,
> > all had this.
> Neither do the relevant RFC's, or any other DNS implementation. Pre-8.2.3
> was simply _wrong_ to accept that syntax.
Is there any particular harm from accepting this syntax. It wouldn't be
the first time a RFC has been updated to match working code.