Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: BGP and anycast

  • From: Marc Slemko
  • Date: Tue Jan 30 13:02:09 2001

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 hardie@equinix.com wrote:

>   One potential problem with using shared unicast addresses is that
>   routers forwarding traffic to them may have more than one available
>   route, and those routes may, in fact, reach different instances of
>   the shared unicast address.  Because UDP is self-contained, UDP
>   traffic from a single source reaching different instances presents
>   no problem.  TCP traffic, in contrast, may fail or present

That should be a little more precise.

TCP packets can not (for all practical purposes when dealing with "normal"
clients) be self contained.

UDP packets are self contained, from the network view.

But that does not mean that a particular protocol implemented on top of
UDP will necessarily still be self contained, merely that it is possible
for it to be.






Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.