Beginning December 01 2000
Messages: 557
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Date, Thread, Author,
Historical

Other Merit Archives

How to Join an E-Mail List

abha

• 12/27/00 EGP/Peering survey
  

Adam Rothschild

• 12/30/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/20/00 [OT] Stupid list participant
  
• 12/20/00 [OT] Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Adrian OCampo

• 12/08/00 RE: Interliant and Digex
  

Alex

• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  

Alex Bligh

• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  

Alex Pilosov

• 12/26/00 RE: POP construction standards (was Re:
  
• 12/10/00 Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodnes
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Andrew Brown

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/20/00 Re: RFC Outlines
  
• 12/20/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  

Andrew Odlyzko

• 12/03/00 Re: pretty cool paper re "myth of Intern
  

Andrew Partan

• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Anne Marcel Roorda

• 12/15/00 RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was R
  

Ariel Biener

• 12/13/00 Re: Remote Console, Power Management
  

Avi Freedman

• 12/09/00 Re: Akamai..
  
• 12/09/00 Re: Akamai..
  

Avleen Vig

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Bandy Rush

• 12/13/00 Lightning and nacamar down?
  

Basil Kruglov

• 12/29/00 Re: public route servers
  
• 12/07/00 Re: moscow
  

Ben Buxton

• 12/18/00 Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Bennett Todd

• 12/22/00 monitoring box (was Re: small device wit
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Bill Fumerola

• 12/30/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Bill Petrisko

• 12/12/00 Cogent Communications?
  

Bill Woodcock

• 12/31/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Pinging routers for network status
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Pinging routers for network status
  

BillT

• 12/16/00 Touch America?
  
• 12/09/00 MCI outage in Wy.
  

Blaine Christian

• 12/18/00 RE: Pinging routers for network status
  

Bora Akyol

• 12/04/00 Re: Internet performance measures compar
  

Brad seves

• 12/23/00 Our Listings #4A14
  

Brandon Ross

• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Anyone can help on this puzzle?
  

Brantley Jones

• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  

Brent Van Dussen

• 12/30/00 Re: [NANOG-LIST] public route servers
  

brett watson

• 12/18/00 Re: political ramifcations of internet p
  

Brian Kifiak

• 12/07/00 Re: California power - its cold, its dar
  

Brian W.

• 12/20/00 Re: [OT]Port scanning legal
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/13/00 Re: 10/100 PCI Ethernet
  
• 12/12/00 Re: ISP operational question
  
• 12/12/00 Re: ISP operational question
  
• 12/10/00 Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodnes
  
• 12/08/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Bruce Campbell

• 12/07/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Bryan S. Blank

• 12/14/00 Re: OT: pagers/phones
  

Canham

• 12/05/00 Receive a FREE Satellite T.V. System.
  

Chance Whaley

• 12/10/00 RE: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodnes
  

Charles Smith

• 12/26/00 [no subject]
  
• 12/14/00 Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Packet Loss
  
• 12/12/00 ISP operational question
  

Charles Sprickman

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho
  
• 12/14/00 OT: pagers/phones
  

Chris Adams

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Chris Beggy

• 12/07/00 Re: moscow
  
• 12/07/00 Re: moscow
  
• 12/07/00 moscow
  

Chris Cappuccio

• 12/19/00 Re: FDDI to FE?
  

Chris Woodfield

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Christian Kuhtz

• 12/30/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/27/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/18/00 RE: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/05/00 RE: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  
• 12/05/00 RE: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  
• 12/03/00 RE: pretty cool paper re "myth of Intern
  

Christian Nielsen

• 12/20/00 RE: [OT] Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Cogent Communications?
  

Christopher Gibiault

• 12/21/00 RE: small device with IP address
  

Christopher L. Morrow

• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  

Cumming, James

• 12/06/00 RE: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  

Dan Hollis

• 12/29/00 public route servers
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  

Dan.Brzoska

• 12/12/00 RE: Broadwing Reference Request
  

Dana Hudes

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Daniel Golding

• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/15/00 RE: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homi
  
• 12/15/00 RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was R
  

Daniel L. Golding

• 12/30/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/25/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/22/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/17/00 Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homi
  
• 12/17/00 Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homi
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/13/00 Re: Cogent Communications?
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Daniel Roesen

• 12/30/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Daniel Senie

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Danny McPherson

• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Dave Cooper

• 12/14/00 Re: Metro-area fiber providers (WAS Re:
  

Dave Curado

• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  

David Charlap

• 12/22/00 Re: monitoring box (was Re: small device
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

David Diaz

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  

David Hares

• 12/24/00 RE: small device with IP address
  
• 12/20/00 RE: FDDI to FE?
  
• 12/07/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

David Lesher

• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

deeann mikula

• 12/14/00 Re: OT: pagers/phones
  

Deepak Jain

• 12/21/00 RE: small device with IP address
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  

Dennis Dayman

• 12/21/00 RE: ICQ down?
  

Derek J. Balling

• 12/31/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/14/00 Re: OT: pagers/phones
  

Deron J. Ringen

• 12/29/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Deron J.Ringen

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  

dklindt

• 12/05/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Dominic J. Eidson

• 12/07/00 Re: California power - its cold, its dar
  

doug

• 12/26/00 Re: your mail
  
• 12/16/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Douglas A. Dever

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  

Dustin Clampitt

• 12/05/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Edetect

• 12/29/00 Find Out the TRUTH About AnyOne !!
  

Edward S. Marshall

• 12/19/00 Port scanning legal
  

Eric Germann

• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  

Fletcher E Kittredge

• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  

Frank Hellemink

• 12/05/00 RE: troubles in above.net and chellonetw
  

Geoffrey Zinderdine

• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Gordon Cook

• 12/28/00 Feb 2001 COOK Report contents & distribu
  

Gregory Soo

• 12/03/00 RE: pretty cool paper re "myth of Intern
  

grisha

• 12/07/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  

Hal Murray

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 12/21/00 Re: ICQ down?
  
• 12/21/00 ICQ down?
  

Henry R. Linneweh

• 12/20/00 Re: [OT]Port scanning legal
  

Hugh Irvine

• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

J.D. Falk

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  

Jade Deane

• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Jade E. Deane

• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/15/00 multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: P
  
• 12/10/00 Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodness
  

James S. Smith

• 12/05/00 Problems with Turner network (AS-5662)?
  

jamie rishaw

• 12/17/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/13/00 Re: Cogent Communications?
  
• 12/07/00 man filters
  
• 12/07/00 Re: Correction
  
• 12/01/00 ANN: New List: usdomreg
  

Jason

• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Jason A. Mills

• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Jason Lewis

• 12/31/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 RE: NPIC Warning
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Pinging routers for network status
  

Jason Lixfeld

• 12/04/00 RE: Who's peering at Ameritech?
  
• 12/03/00 Who's peering at Ameritech?
  
• 12/01/00 RE: Network Availability Report
  
• 12/01/00 Network Availability Report
  

Jason Slagle

• 12/31/00 Re: NPIC Warning
  

Jay Ford

• 12/18/00 RE: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Jeff Barrows

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  

Jeff Hodges

• 12/05/00 troubles in above.net and chellonetwork.
  

Jeff Mcadams

• 12/29/00 Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather
  
• 12/28/00 Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Reference Request
  

Jeff Wheat

• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  

Jeff.Hodges

• 12/05/00 Re: troubles in above.net and chellonetw
  

Jerry Scharf

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Jim Logan

• 12/12/00 Re: Clue at @Home?
  
• 12/12/00 Clue at @Home?
  

Jim Mercer

• 12/22/00 Re: environmental monitors
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Clue at @Home?
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Cogent Communications?
  
• 12/08/00 assistance with Lucent/Ascend MAX/TNT, 1
  

Jimmy Kyriannis

• 12/22/00 environmental monitors
  
• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/19/00 Re: FDDI to FE?
  
• 12/19/00 Re: FDDI to FE?
  

jlewis

• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho
  
• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/20/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Sprint Peering
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodnes
  

Joe Abley

• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  

Joe Blanchard

• 12/21/00 Fiber cut?
  

Joe Budion

• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  

Joe McGuckin

• 12/08/00 RE[2]: California power - its cold, its
  

Joe Shaw

• 12/14/00 Re: OT: pagers/phones
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 12/23/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  

John Fraizer

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/30/00 OT
  
• 12/30/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/30/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/30/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/17/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/09/00 Dampening on Juniper routers
  
• 12/07/00 Re: moscow
  
• 12/07/00 Re: Correction
  
• 12/07/00 Re: moscow
  
• 12/07/00 Re: moscow
  
• 12/07/00 Correction
  
• 12/07/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/07/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/01/00 Re: GPO web site - supremecourtus.gov
  

John Hawkinson

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

john heasley

• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/09/00 Re: Dampening on Juniper routers
  

John M . Brown

• 12/18/00 Re: Pinging routers for network status
  

John Todd

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Jon Mansey

• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Jonathan Disher

• 12/15/00 Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing w
  

k claffy

• 12/02/00 pretty cool paper re "myth of Internet g
  

Kai Schlichting

• 12/08/00 Re: Interliant and Digex
  
• 12/05/00 Re: a privacy violation at the DC Renais
  
• 12/05/00 a privacy violation at the DC Renaissanc
  

Kalus, Michael

• 12/19/00 Anybody from Interliant in D.C. here?
  

Karyn Ulriksen

• 12/15/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Kysi Ferul Plague
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/12/00 Broadwing Summary Revised
  
• 12/12/00 Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/12/00 Thanx for the Broadwing Feedback
  
• 12/12/00 Broadwing Reference Request
  
• 12/11/00 RE: Sprint Peering
  

Ken Fischer

• 12/28/00 Pagenet SMTP problems
  
• 12/21/00 Re: ICQ down?
  

Kevin_Badeen

• 12/18/00 Re: looking glass resources, as promised
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Reference Request
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/01/00 RE: Network Availability Report
  
• 12/01/00 Re: Network Availability Report
  

L. Sassaman

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  

Larry Sheldon

• 12/20/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/20/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

LBolton

• 12/08/00 Interliant and Digex
  

Leo Bicknell

• 12/24/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Leo Nelson

• 12/13/00 10/100 PCI Ethernet
  

Lloyd Taylor

• 12/07/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Lucy E. Lynch

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  

M. David Leonard

• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Majdi S. Abbas

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  

Marc Teichtahl

• 12/05/00 Re: troubles in above.net and chellonetw
  

Marius Strom

• 12/20/00 (Somewhat OT) "Scary, Sneaky HR46"
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  

Mark Borchers

• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  

Mark E. Perkins

• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Mark Mentovai

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/30/00 Re: public route servers
  
• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/10/00 Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodnes
  

Mark Milhollan

• 12/29/00 Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather
  

Mark Radabaugh

• 12/07/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Marshall Eubanks

• 12/30/00 NPIC Warning
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/08/00 Re: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/01/00 Re: Network Availability Report
  

Martin Cooper

• 12/13/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  

Mathew Butler

• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/16/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/11/00 Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacrament
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Matt Clauson

• 12/14/00 Re: Metro-area fiber providers (WAS Re:
  
• 12/13/00 Metro-area fiber providers (WAS Re: Coge
  

Matt Levine

• 12/18/00 RE: Pinging routers for network status
  
• 12/18/00 RE: Pinging routers for network status
  
• 12/12/00 RE: Cogent Communications?
  
• 12/09/00 RE: Akamai..
  
• 12/09/00 Akamai..
  
• 12/04/00 re: Anyone with a clue at CAIS.NET?
  

Matt Thoene

• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Matthew Kaufman

• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/07/00 Re: California power - its cold, its dar
  

Matthew S. Hallacy

• 12/20/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/14/00 Re: OT: pagers/phones
  

Matthew Schlegel

• 12/06/00 HTTPS accelerators
  

mdevney

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/05/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Michael C . Wu

• 12/24/00 Re: small device with IP address
  

Michael Long

• 12/14/00 monitoring
  

Michael Shields

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

michael thomas guldan

• 12/18/00 political ramifcations of internet power
  

Michelle T

• 12/30/00 Re: public route servers
  

Miguel A.L. Paraz

• 12/29/00 RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
  
• 12/21/00 Re: ICQ down?
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Pinging routers for network status
  

Mikael Abrahamsson

• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/21/00 RE: small device with IP address
  
• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/21/00 small device with IP address
  

Mike Hughes

• 12/05/00 Re: a privacy violation at the DC Renais
  

Mr. James W. Laferriere

• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

msarges

• 12/13/00 Re: Clue at @Home?
  

Muir, Ronald

• 12/26/00 RE: POP construction standards (was Re:
  
• 12/15/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/15/00 RE: Packet Loss
  

multics

• 12/27/00 Dialup congestion and winter weather (fw
  

Nadin, Holly

• 12/07/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/07/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

nanog

• 12/17/00 Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homi
  
• 12/16/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/06/00 Anyone can help on this puzzle?
  
• 12/05/00 Re: Re: Is MPLS based VPN really feasibl
  

Nathan Stratton

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho
  
• 12/08/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/08/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/07/00 Re: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/05/00 Re: Re: Is MPLS based VPN really feasibl
  
• 12/04/00 Re: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  

Neil J. McRae

• 12/30/00 Re: public route servers
  
• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  

Omachonu Ogali

• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Patrick Evans

• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  

Patrick Greenwell

• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  

Patrick Harrison

• 12/07/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  

Patrick Hollowell

• 12/12/00 Remote Console, Power Management
  

Paul Lantinga

• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Paul Timmins

• 12/16/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Paul Vixie

• 12/18/00 Re: Pinging routers for network status
  
• 12/15/00 Re: multi-homing without the BGP (was R
  

Pete Rohrman

• 12/19/00 RFC Outlines
  

Pete Templin

• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Quark Physics

• 12/07/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Ralph Forsythe

• 12/19/00 RE: Qwest yesterday?
  
• 12/19/00 Qwest yesterday?
  

Randy Bush

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/22/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/13/00 [no subject]
  
• 12/13/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/12/00 RE: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/11/00 Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/05/00 RE: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  

Reid B. Fishler

• 12/19/00 FDDI to FE?
  

Reid Fishler

• 12/13/00 Re: Lightning and nacamar down?
  

Reid Knuttila

• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Rich Fulton

• 12/11/00 Re: Sprint Peering
  
• 12/07/00 Re: man filters
  

Rich Sena

• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  

Richard A. Steenbergen

• 12/31/00 RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/30/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/26/00 Re: your mail
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  

Richard Jimmerson

• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  

RIPE NCC

• 12/21/00 RIPE Whois RPSL Migration
  

Robert Boyle

• 12/15/00 Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
  

Roeland Meyer

• 12/22/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/20/00 RE: [OT] Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/20/00 RE: [OT] Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  
• 12/11/00 RE: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacra
  
• 12/07/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/07/00 RE: California power - its cold, its dar
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 RE: Facts, Statistics and Urban Legends
  

Roy

• 12/04/00 Anyone with a clue at CAIS.NET?
  

Sam Thomas

• 12/07/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Sami Juvonen

• 12/19/00 RE: RFC Outlines
  

Schmiedt, Jamie

• 12/01/00 RE: Internet metrics
  

Scott Bradner

• 12/14/00 RE: Packet Loss
  

Scott Patterson

• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/21/00 RE: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/11/00 Sprint Peering
  

Scott Solmonson

• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

scott w

• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Sean Donelan

• 12/30/00 Re: NPIC Warning
  
• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/27/00 Dialup congestion and winter weather
  
• 12/27/00 San Jose power outage
  
• 12/26/00 RE: POP construction standards (was Re:
  
• 12/26/00 POP construction standards (was Re: [Emp
  
• 12/22/00 Re: environmental monitors
  
• 12/19/00 Identifying network contacts (Re: Port s
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/18/00 Pinging routers for network status
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  
• 12/07/00 California power - its cold, its dark
  
• 12/05/00 Operations: where are you going to sit?
  
• 12/04/00 Internet performance measures compared t
  
• 12/03/00 Facts, Statistics and Urban Legends from
  
• 12/03/00 Re: pretty cool paper re "myth of Intern
  
• 12/02/00 Re: pretty cool paper re "myth of Intern
  
• 12/01/00 GPO web site - supremecourtus.gov
  

Shawn McMahon

• 12/28/00 Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/12/00 Re: ISP operational question
  
• 12/07/00 Apologies
  
• 12/07/00 Re: [elug-advo] Re: An idea <- Your exam
  
• 12/07/00 RE: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Simon Lockhart

• 12/30/00 Re: public route servers
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Simon Lyall

• 12/29/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

smd

• 12/12/00 Re: Broadwing Summary
  

Smith, Ed

• 12/06/00 Route-maps
  

Stephen J. Wilcox

• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Stephen Sprunk

• 12/19/00 Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  

Stephen Stuart

• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/31/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/12/00 Re: ISP operational question
  

Steve Carter

• 12/04/00 Re: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  

Steve Goldstein

• 12/21/00 Re: small device with IP address
  

Steve Meuse

• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Steve Noble

• 12/29/00 Re: public route servers
  

Steve Riley (MCS)

• 12/19/00 RE: Qwest yesterday?
  

Steve Snyder

• 12/13/00 transit services over exchange point 'cl
  

Steve Sobol

• 12/30/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  
• 12/21/00 Re: ICQ down?
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/14/00 Re: OT: pagers/phones
  

Steven J. Sobol

• 12/19/00 RE: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/18/00 Re: Pinging routers for network status
  

Steven M. Bellovin

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/17/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Susan R. Harris

• 12/04/00 RE: Internet metrics
  
• 12/01/00 Call for Presentations - Atlanta
  

Thomas Kernen

• 12/31/00 Re: public route servers
  

tiernan ray

• 12/05/00 Re: Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in
  

Timothy Brown

• 12/30/00 Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for V
  

Timothy J Salo

• 12/07/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  
• 12/06/00 Re: Operations: where are you going to s
  

Toby_Williams

• 12/04/00 Re: Network Availability Tool
  

Todd Caine

• 12/12/00 Re: ISP operational question
  

Todd Suiter

• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/12/00 Re: Clue at @Home?
  

Tom

• 12/22/00 Re: small device with IP address
  

Tom Pinard

• 12/13/00 Re: 10/100 PCI Ethernet
  

Tony Bates

• 12/29/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 12/22/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 12/15/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 12/08/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 12/01/00 The Cidr Report
  

Tony Mumm

• 12/21/00 RE: small device with IP address
  

Tony Rall

• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

Travis Pugh

• 12/30/00 Re: public route servers
  
• 12/19/00 RE: Qwest yesterday?
  
• 12/17/00 Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homi
  
• 12/17/00 Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homi
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  
• 12/19/00 Re: Port scanning legal
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/15/00 Re: Packet Loss
  
• 12/14/00 Re: Packet Loss
  

vic112

• 12/15/00 Create Your Own Fake Id's From Home
  

VIIS Network Operations Center

• 12/13/00 Re: Cogent Communications?
  

Vijay Gill

• 12/21/00 Re: florida ix(en) facing south
  

Vinay Bannai

• 12/16/00 Re: Metro-area fiber providers (WAS Re:
  

William Stephenson

• 12/12/00 Re: Cogent Communications?
  

Yu Ning

• 12/04/00 Is MPLS based VPN really feasible in rea
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month