North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Brett L. Hawn
- Date: Tue Oct 24 10:24:53 2000
As a general rule, a response of any sort is preferable to nothing, at least
it means somebody bothered to read the complaint, which is quite a stretch
from the truth in quite a few places.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 10:12 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: whois
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:53:16 EDT, Marshall Eubanks
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > Are you really saying that if I tell you that a dial-up user on
> your network
> > hacked into my system at some precise time, from a precise IP address
> > (so that you could probably tell easily which user did it), and did so
> > in a fashion
> > which suggested an automated "script kiddie" effort, I should only
> > expect a response from you if I PAY for it ?!?
> Umm... would you be satisfied with a "We've referred it to the appropriate
> people" response?
> At least here, and probably many other universities, we're stuck not being
> able to say much more than that due to student confidentiality rules...
> Yes, we take action. No, we usually can't say what we did.
> Valdis Kletnieks
> Operating Systems Analyst
> Virginia Tech