North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: decreased caching efficiency?
- From: Marshall Eubanks
- Date: Tue Oct 24 09:05:43 2000
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> [ On Friday, October 20, 2000 at 09:44:37 (-0400), Dana Hudes wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: decreased caching efficiency?
> > I pay my ISP to carry IP packets around. Caching is acceptable in some cases
> > but not in others.
> You control how your information is distributed. If you do not wish it
> to be cached in any meaningful manner by an ISP or anyone else then you
> must use protocols that are inherently uncachable, such as those
> protected by strong cryptography.
> > In some cases certainly your cache is in fact a copyright violation.
> No, it's absolutely NOT. You knowingly publish your content in a medium
> where copying is an inherent part of the system (at many levels!).
> If you do not accept that arbitrary copies will be made of your data
> then must not publish your information on the Internet. Period. No
> amount of ignorance of the medium is a valid excuse in this day and age.
For what it's worth the Digitial Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA)
explicitly EXEMPTS caching as a violation of copyright. (This only
holds for music and maybe video, but it is a clear precedent.)
> Greg A. Woods
> +1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <email@example.com> <robohack!woods>
> Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>
Multicast Technologies, Inc.
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 201
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.on-the-i.com