North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: decreased caching efficiency?
- From: Majdi S. Abbas
- Date: Fri Oct 20 12:31:23 2000
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:24:27AM -0400, Dana Hudes wrote:
> No, you are interfering with my revenue stream by preventing
> my getting credit for the banner impression.
Tough. Banner ads aren't a guaranteed form of revenue.
How would you feel if I said my cache at home filters banner
content out? You do not have a guaranteed right to spew
advertisements. If banner revenue is a large part of your
revenue model, I think you need to consider revising it.
> right. your customers pay you to get them the packets they asked for and if
> they want to visit my site and see my content and your cache breaks that,
> you're not delivering what your customers requested. My site won't deliver
> content in most of the pages without the ads displaying.
Not having a site that is cache friendly is the equivalent of
not having a site that works with Netscape|IE|etc. I don't see how your
content is the responsibility of anyone else but you.
> At the moment there is a timeout built in while I wait for the ad network
> to increase server capacity to meet demand.
> It will go away.
Ahh, so your page is disgustingly slow, and you want to keep it
that way.
--msa
|