North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
- From: Garlic
- Date: Wed Apr 05 00:26:26 2000
Why you dragging me into this :-) We have no business relationship with
Ehud Gavron wrote:
> This argument is specious. Gordon isn't press. Well, garlic press
> p.s. "press credentials" are not hard to fake, but ask Gordon for his
> >On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400 Paul Ferguson wrote:
> >> >surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOG
> >> >
> >> > >Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000
> >> > >To: Notify
> >> > >Subject: Exodus Customer Confidential Communication
> >> > >
> >> Gordon,
> >> Does the word "confidential" elude you?
> >> - paul
> >Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> >If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> >the press not report it?
> >If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> >If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
> >There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> >press is a profound good for society....
> >P.S. "Scandal-Monger", Safire, William, 2000