North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: Funk *that* (was Re: whois broke again?)
- From: Leonard, Jason M.
- Date: Sun Feb 20 01:57:28 2000
Understood, that's why I'm looking for input. I'd like to come up with a
reliable system, even though it's necessarily going to be a hair or two
behind the 'live' databases.
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Leonard, Jason M.
Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Sent: 2/20/00 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: Funk *that* (was Re: whois broke again?)
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 01:32:35 EST, "Leonard, Jason M."
<Jason.Leonard@wcom.net> said:
> How hard could it be to maintain a mirror or something close to a
mirror?
> I'm willing to donate a box and a few hours a week. Email me off list
with
> your input and I'll post the results.
A mirror would help if the primary server was unreachable.
The problem being reported NOW is the spewage of data that claims
to be correct. Unless you run your mirror in a "pull, wait 8 hours
for verification, and THEN commit" mode, the mirror will be spewing
the same broken data.
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
|