North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS
- From: danielle v.
- Date: Sat Jan 15 00:08:42 2000
On 14 Jan 2000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> Date: 14 Jan 2000 18:41:48 -0800
> From: Paul Vixie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS
> That's a misleading question. MAPS RSS doesn't probe for relay openness
> unless spam has been received from the relay in question. OTOH, if there
> is spam receipt and if the relay doesn't appear to be reachable, a human
> operator can decide that a firewall might be involved and block the relay
> in spite of our inability to test it.
> MAPS RSS never blocks whole address ranges, only /32's.
> ORBS is apparently blocking whole /16's belonging to Abovenet only because
> Abovenet refuses to have whole /16's probed for SMTP servers and then having
> each such server probed for relay openness. (I can't say as I blame them.)
> Paul Vixie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In effect, Above.net is (by filtering the ORBS probes) licensing every single IP
in their /16 to spam via the sordid and detailed means that ORBS works to
This is an incorrect assumption? Please educate me as to how this is the
wrong way to view this.
I am under the assumption that the said block on Above.net/16 didn't go into
effect until ORBS itself was blocked - thus the resulting block on Above.net.