North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: RPSL announcement text
- From: Sean Donelan
- Date: Wed Dec 08 20:59:03 1999
On Wed, 08 December 1999, Randy Bush wrote:
> the operational issue is not y2k this or that. the issue for ops folk is
> that it is a change being made during what is anticipated to be the worst
> part of the the y2k window which could be made some other time. this means
> that, if it is visible in any way, it can be confused with y2k symptoms thus
> adding to real operators' (as opposed to nanog posters') debugging problems
> at what may be a bad time.
I'm not a big fan of making changes that night, but this was announced
several months ago at IETF, NANOG and several mailing lists. I didn't
hear anyone object to the schedule when it was announced. I did hear
people complain about the RADB maintainer fee, so people were listening.
For better or worse, is it getting a bit late to go changing the schedule?
Is anyone still using the ripe-181 version of the IRR?