North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
- From: Phillip Vandry
- Date: Mon Oct 18 16:18:23 1999
> Yes, but...
> The first step doing any increase difficult was done when the
> HOST_NAME->IP_ADDRESS translation was chosen instead of
> HOST_NAME:SERVICE -> IP_ADDRESS:PORT
> Now we have a lot of troubles due to this choose.
Of course if we could implement RFC2052 everywhere...
I wonder if _any_ popular end user software has quietly added forward
compatibility with SRV records?