North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Hi, I'm from Cable and Wireless and I'm here to help...
- From: Jeff Young
- Date: Wed Sep 16 15:58:42 1998
i believe that 800-977-4662 (inoc) will still work.
our numbers aren't changing soon, but will change
within the next six months. i've cc'd firstname.lastname@example.org
which is also email@example.com for the time being. they
could provide more up-to-date information.
> Return-Path: SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM
> Received: from ALPHA1.RESTON.MCI.NET (alpha1 [126.96.36.199])
> by postoffice.Reston.mci.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA15674
> for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 14:54:43 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from SDG.DRA.COM ([188.8.131.52])
> by ALPHA1.RESTON.MCI.NET (PMDF V5.2-29 #27226)
> with SMTP id <01J1VMLA3T8Q00168M@ALPHA1.RESTON.MCI.NET> for
> email@example.com (ORCPT rfc822;young@mci.NET); Wed,
> 16 Sep 1998 14:54:42 EDT
> Received: by SDG.DRA.COM with VMSmail; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 13:54:40 -0500
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 13:54:40 -0500
> From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
> Subject: Re: Hi, I'm from Cable and Wireless and I'm here to help...
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
> Message-id: <980916135440.eb27@SDG.DRA.COM>
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 711
> >In the interest of the free flow of useful and correct information
> >with regard to the divestiture of internetMCI, please do not believe
> >anything you hear, rather feel free to ask. There are a number of
> >ex-MCI'ers listening and we'll be happy to debunk rumors from whatever
> >source. Basic rule, if it came from anything but a 'cw.net' address
> >please ask before you jump in.
> Hi. I'm updating my customer service and NOC phone number lists. Will
> the InternetMCI still be using MCI exchanges and call centers, or will
> the phone numbers be changing to C&W exchanges?
> Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
> Affiliation given for identification not representation