North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: NY times appears to have had a rough morning..
- From: Hank Nussbacher
- Date: Mon Sep 14 02:31:07 1998
On Sun, 13 Sep 1998, Derek Balling wrote:
For HFG always check document source for previous hacked sites and their
"hidden" agenda. Also it gives a clue that they are not 15 year old high
school kids as their CAPs and number/character alterations attempt to
deceive. -Hank
> What I think you missed is that shortly after I received this post (and
> looked at the NYTimes web site) they corrected the problem which caused the
> original post.
>
> www.nytimes.com got hacked. If you missed it, and feel the urge to check it
> out, I made a mirror of it at http://www.megacity.org/hacked_nytimes/ ... I
> don't plan to keep it more than a few days I suspect (I'm not one of those
> hacked-website collectors like some places *grin*), but I kept it for
> posterity of those who might want to check it out.
>
> D
>
> At 10:50 AM 9/13/98 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
> >Richard Irving wrote:
> >
> >> Hrmm.. This sunday am I logged into www.nytimes.com,
> >> and got an unusual front page. Someone may want to take
> >> a look......
> >
> >Looks like the classicalunderconfigured/overloaded server to me. They were
> >probably running with not much spare capacity before, or didn't configure the
> >correct number of listening processes (or enough RAM to handle them).
> >
> >Possibly a SYN attack. But on this date, more likely a demand "attack".
> >
> >This is not unusual when you consider the total capacity is ultimately
> >determined by the suits.
> >
> >FYI, I had no trouble pulling it from icreport.loc.gov. I got it in the
> >evening, which would have been the 2nd demand curve for the day. So server
> >capacity there was enough to deliver it in that probably broader hump. But
> >maybe the masses, who normally go checking news sites and wouldn't recognize
> >a .gov site as even being an Internet thing, were clobbering places like
> >www.nytimes.com. Even www.cnn.com seemed kinda slow to me.
> >
> >--
> >Phil Howard | stop7it2@anyplace.edu die7spam@spammer0.com
> stop0ads@spammer5.org
> > phil | a2b8c2d0@s1p8a2m2.edu stop9it3@anyplace.com
> stop8303@spam4mer.org
> > at | no45ads1@lame3ads.org eat2this@dumbads5.net
> stop6629@anywhere.net
> > ipal | end1ads8@s2p4a6m3.edu ads8suck@anyplace.com
> stop0549@no9place.com
> > dot | blow3me9@anyplace.com no29ads0@anywhere.net
> stop1694@no71ads2.net
> > net |stop4688@s5p9a1m1.net end0it82@no2where.com
> end1it08@no0place.edu
>
Hank Nussbacher
|