Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: BBN/GTEI - Optical Internet solves asymmetric data flows

  • From: Bill St. Arnaud
  • Date: Wed Aug 26 11:02:47 1998

All:

The issue of asymmetric data flows is one of the reasons why we are building
an optical Internet here in Canada.  With an optical Internet you can
traffic engineer individual wavelengths to support Tx/Rx asymmetric data
flows in any way you want. This makes much more efficient use of the
underlying fiber indrastructure.

For more information

www.canarie.ca
www.canet2.net

Bill

-------------------------------------------
Bill St Arnaud
Director Network Projects
CANARIE
bill.st.arnaud@canarie.ca
http://www.canarie.ca/bstarn

 

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Michael Dillon
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 1998 7:44 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: BBN/GTEI
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> > > > In fact, what you're advocating is billing the sender for
> *solicited data*
> > > > from the recipient's point of view!
> > >
> > > Not at all. I am advocating paying for transit.
> >
> > On the contrary.
> >
> > If I buy a DS1 for transit from your network, I'm expecting the
> person I pay
> > to provide transit - ALL OF THE TRANSIT.
>
> Of course, and I agree with you 100%. But I was not talking about a
> transit customer. I was talking about a peer whose traffic interchange is
> asymmetric and who therefore uses some regional transit in the other guy's
> network. I'm saying that instead of slamming the door in his face and
> telling him to buy transit, we need to have a scalable peering option that
> is a blend.
>
> Maybe I am headed in the wrong direction with this but I do believe we
> need a better solution for peering with asymmetric peers that reduces the
> barriers to entry to $$$. Right now there are barriers to entry that
> probably will not pass the scrutiny of the DOJ.
>
> > No, its actually becoming MORE suitable.  Instead of burning the entire
> > circuit in both directions, you're only burning half of it now (one
> > direction).
>
> You still have to pay for the whole circuit.
>
> --
> Michael Dillon                 -               Internet & ISP Consulting
> Memra Communications Inc.      -               E-mail: michael@memra.com
> Check the website for my Internet World articles -
http://www.memra.com






Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.