North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Michael Dillon
- Date: Sat Aug 22 10:18:53 1998
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> In the past we have
> >> considered the initiator of IP transactions to be irrelevant and had
> >> no-charge peering for networks that basically send a similar number of
> >> bytes to what they receive.
> >> So what do we do when that is no longer the case?
> Pray someone doesn't write a call-back protocol, so traffic flows in
> the opposite direction from the original initiator of the IP 'transaction'.
FTP already does this. Nevertheless, the largest number of bytes still
flows in the same direction as it would with HTTP. I think you are
agreeing with me that the initiator of the transaction is irrelevant. I
would go further and say that the customers of the peers and their actions
are also irrelevant to the peering relationship.
Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting
Memra Communications Inc. - E-mail: email@example.com
Check the website for my Internet World articles - http://www.memra.com