North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: MAE-East - Operational question
- From: Richard Irving
- Date: Thu Aug 20 18:42:22 1998
Communism, *NOT* marxism.
router> conf t
router> int nanog 0
router> no ip directed-communism
router> access-group 66 IN
router> access-list 66 deny MARXISM
router> access-list 66 deny _POLITICS_
router> access-list 66 deny POLITICAL_PARTIES
router> access-list 66 permit PHILOSOPHY
router> access-list 66 permit IDEAOLOGY
And now I leave the remainder of this discussion to OFF NANOG.
(and your local Poli-SCI PHD)
This config doesn't seem to be helping my routing much.... But,
in your defense, I am actually saying the opposite of what you *think*.
(I am saying it *doesn't* work , but making a distinction between
the ideology, and "supposed" implementations going by that name,
that *fine grained* distinction *is* the point :(
The depths of greed that *some* of humanity exhibit,
being the fatal flaw for both plans. (FDDI&COMMUNISM)
> Richard Irving wrote:
> > *Pure* communism was a great ideaology! However,
> > its failure, for the most part, was cited
> > as "not accounting for human nature"
> as if.
> that's the most often heard, and most false statement
> one can make about communism.
> try actually reading communist literature, and see if
> you think marxism is such a great idealogy.