North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Digex transparent proxying
- From: Derek Elder
- Date: Sat Jun 27 19:05:38 1998
This seems like more of a marketing issue than an operational issue. I see
transparent proxying as another product offering in which you would have two
Option 1 -- Utilize transparent proxying by applying policy based routing.
This causes the backbone providers to use less bandwidth, so customers cost
is reduced (i.e., highest cost is the backbone, so apply a discount for less
bandwidth use). If contracts prior to the placement of the proxy are in
place, the customer would have to provide explicit approval (and realize a
reduced cost) before this policy would be applied.
Option 2 -- Apply no policy to the end users connection. This is typically
what "in place" contracts had in mind. If I agree to pay you $xxxx.xx/month
for a connection before the cache was put in place, I should still receive
that connection unaltered.
BTW, I am in favor of transparent proxying...but not if I don't control it.
US Web / Gray Peak Technologies
Pager - 888-232-5028
A Strategic Partner for the