North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: smurf amp nets
- From: Karl Denninger
- Date: Sat Jun 13 10:49:19 1998
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 10:14:11AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > One other thing, it would be interesting if someone started
> > a smurf at a smurf amp. (I'm tired, but believe that can be
> > done, but not going to think too much about it. The loop
> > would be interesting, and require some fun intervention to fix).
> I think this is the way of the future when smurf amps get fixed. People
> will put these kind of things on hacked machines, sending spoofed floods
> to broadcast adresses locally. Since everybody seems to be going to
> switched nets this can create substantial amount of data.
> I think the only way to solve this more permanently is to remove the
> response of ICMP data to broadcast adresses in the OS. Is anyone
> preassuring for this to happen? Is there a list of OS that actually does
> respond to ICMP to broadcast adresses?
Recent FreeBSD versions have an option to disable response to a broadcast
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
| NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost