North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: SMURF amplifier block list
- From: Jay R. Ashworth
- Date: Tue Apr 14 15:47:03 1998
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 08:49:04AM -0700, Aaron Beck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a
> > similar but more profound effect. Anyone who actually uses a .255
> > address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.
> the problem with that thinking, of course, is going to crop up when you
> encounter /23's and greater.
No, IMHO, the comment stands: no matter _what_ size your network is, if
you assign host addresses with a .0 or .255 final octet, things may
break, and you deserve what you get.
Jay R. Ashworth email@example.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592
Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com