Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation [Was: Re: IPv8 < IPv6]

  • From: Paul Ferguson
  • Date: Thu Nov 06 17:18:06 1997

Alan,

Thinking about your response, I am reminded of the
MUST and SHOULD semantics in the context of IETF
documents.  ;-)

- paul

At 05:03 PM 11/6/97 -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:

>
>  Networks that span large geographic areas should be deaggregated
>  into regional ares such that aggregation can be efficiently
>  implemented.
>
>  Additionally, within this provider, they should allocate their
>  chunk of the address space in a geographic manner.
>





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.