Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv8 < IPv6

  • From: Alan Hannan
  • Date: Thu Nov 06 16:45:22 1997

  Paul,

  We agree on all but this small point.  Certainly one should
  allocate ip address space in a topological manner.  However, I
  know of several large NSP/ISPs that don't because there's no
  [technological or economic] punitive incentive for them to do so.

  I believe that the correlation between topology and geography will
  increase as a function of time.

  In fact, I believe that today the correlation is quite high.

  The lack of correlation is the exception, in my experience, than
  the rule.

  -alan

Quoting Paul Ferguson (ferguson@cisco.com):
> At 02:19 PM 11/6/97 -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:
> 
> >
> >  Accordingly, not allocating in a geographic fashion lends to
> >  deaggregation, which is bad.
> >
> 
> Correction: Not allocating in a topological fashion lends to
> deaggregation. Geography often has nothing to do with it.
> 
> - paul




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.