North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
- From: Paul A Vixie
- Date: Sun Nov 02 15:29:33 1997
> Yup, it could, but as I noted to Paul, in the cases Sean is advocating,
> the client and the NAT box may not be within the same span of
> administration, either. IE: no, you may _not_ trust the NAT op.
And as I noted in my reply, the real opportunities for NAT are when one
side of the NAT trusts the NAT and the other side considers it "just
another public client".
|
