North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: NAP Architecture
- From: Dave Rand
- Date: Wed Oct 29 12:49:33 1997
[In the message entitled "Re: NAP Architecture" on Oct 29, 8:25, "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" writes:]
> Forgive my ignorance on these matters, but why haven't many NAPS tried
> to be L1 based, or at least provide the option of private wire/fiber
> between the larger customers in the same room. It seems to me that this
> would significantly reduce the complexity and packet-loss we're currently
> seeing. How long would it take to troubleshoot a cross-over FE compared
> to trouble shooting two routers connected via a oversubscribed switch.
> Marketing types are concerned about how to bill and track these, but
> there should be some easy ways around those issues.
This is a critical issue now. MFS is charging up to $1000 per 50'
stretch of wire, for cross-connects between consenting parties at
I think this is bit high, for $27 worth of wire, and $300 worth of
Is there a way that we can collectively negotiate a lower rate for private
cross connects at the maes?