Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: NSP ... New Information

  • From: Jerry Scharf
  • Date: Tue Jun 10 12:52:08 1997

Since Ehud got on his soapbox, I thought I'd get on mine as well.

When we use IP addresses, there are two distinct purposes they serve. The 
first is the unique identification (EID) of a machine. The second is the 
choice of the next hop for routing. If we could split the two parts into 
separate address spaces, then the current 32 bit address space would be plenty 
large for EIDs (if you went to 48 bits, then it would be hard to imagine it 
ever running out.) If the route side of the address space was structured into 
levels of hierarchy, then the total number of routes anyone would be required 
to carry would also be far smaller.

Unfortunately, I have never seen an acceptable solution to discovering the 
route path for a random host. It's a real pain, with lookups, tests and 
redirects all over the place. If anyone has a solution to this that can scale 
for the next 20-30 years, many people will throw flowers at your feet.

Until this happens, the number of bits only skews the balance. The tension 
between addressing and routability is inherent in the dual use and will 
continue to drive the allocation system and router design.


Discussion Communities

About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home

Merit Network, Inc.